|
|
Content
(x
2)
|
Design
|
Editing
|
Organization
|
RANK
|
|
Loan on Me
|
4
|
3-1/2
|
3
|
3-1/2
|
3.2
|
|
Healthcare Renaissance
|
3-1/2
|
3
|
3-1/2
|
4
|
3
|
|
Unemployment Work Group
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Dream Act
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2.8
|
|
Taxes-R-Us
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2.4
|
|
Media Party
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1.8
|
Loan on Me: lots of minor grammatical and punctuation errors
scattered throughout. Design and organization a bit busy for my tastes; and I
don’t really get the horizontal, seemingly hierarchical arrangement.
Healthcare Renaissance: “medicinal field”? Particularly good
tagging. Easy to navigate.
Dream Act: Very busy design with elements all over the place,
although graphics are well incorporated in posts. However, fonts and styles
keep changing in posts. No tagging. “bi-partition”
Taxes-R-Us: Not a lot of posting, but posts are very
detailed. Post archive and emphasis (?) in posts unreadable. No tagging or
search.
Media Party: Content only reaching minimum, although spot
on.No archive, no tagging, no way to navigate except scrolling down. No search
capabilities.
Unemployment Work Group: Good content, and steady content
growth. Fonts keep changing in posts. No tagging, no search capability. Minor
grammatical and punctuation errors scattered throughout.
Note: These grades are ultimately meaningless, as all the will count is the way the project ends up. However, this is a good way to judge what you need to do.
